<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  >
  <channel>
    <title>Shawn Olson article 425 Guestbook</title>
	<dc:publisher>Shawn Olson Creative Arts</dc:publisher>

    
    <link>http://www.shawnolson.net/guest/1/?refType=article&amp;refId=425</link>
    <description>Guestbook Posts</description>


 
   <item>
      <title>article comment by Sharon Quinn</title>
      <link>http://www.shawnolson.net/a/425</link>
      <description>I read your thoughtful insights on educational dysfunction and decided to comment.  I'm in the arduous process of initiating a co-creation learning project that will entail training teachers  in a paradigm that organizes an educational environment around the affective domain as central to learning with cognitive domain as secondary.  I ran a 5 year research study on  this by actually doing what I'm talking about.  The love of learning you mention is, indeed, innate to   learning for life.  It is natural to love to learn, to take in information for our evolvement AND enjoyment.  Many educators  have already noticed this phenomena.  Why this is still ignored en-mass is the mystery. I've more to say, but I've a situation which is demanding my attention.</description>
      <author>Sharon Quinn</author>
      <pubDate>2006-07-27T19:24:15-05:00</pubDate>
    </item>
</channel>

</rss>